All the Way to Timbuktu
What should the United States do? Send five divisions and a coalition force?
If the people of Mali can't stop these armed fighters, then there really is no hope for UNESCO's heritage sites near the famous city of Timbuktu. I suppose there are people who think this version of al Qaeda is a threat, but, really, these are just separatist movements, of which Africa has many. If a country falls into failed state status and ends up being ruled by trucks filled with gunmen, then that's an issue for whom? Can someone unite Africa and create a credible mechanism to deal with these regional and internal issues?
I think this is largely something the locals will have to solve. No one can build your nation for you, and when it falls apart, it really is up to you. Save up and buy some gun trucks of your own.
The destruction of heritage sites is as old as can be. Carthage was once a heritage site, and look what became of it.
Brave
I guess I'm not cool.
The only reason why I think Brave hasn't gotten great reviews is because the reviewers don't want to appear to be enthusiastic, awed, or impressed by Pixar's latest effort. IMDB has it at a 7.8 out of 10.
Really? That low? Which film did you watch?
The film that I watched was amazing. I would give it a nine and a half. I would call it the best animated film of the year, bar none. I would put it up there with Finding Nemo and Tangled. If Finding Nemo had been done with the same level of technology that Pixar had available to it with Brave, wow.
Purely as animation, Brave is a masterpiece. The story is fantastic. The characters are wonderfully fleshed out and the voice acting is superb. Kelly Macdonald is so good in this film that it will open up an entirely new career for her if she chooses to follow that path. It's an original story and it absolutely hits you in the chest. I wish there was more done with the neolithic history of Scotland and with the stone circles and things of that nature. I really liked the historical and social aspect of the film, which made it even more interesting to me.
My only theory on the bad reviews would be this--because Brave is about a young girl, and is primarily about her struggles and her identity, there is a gender backlash against it. Someone else is going to have to write their dissertation on this. Someone a hell of a lot smarter than me is going to have to figure out why people are giving this film lukewarm reviews.
Is it because of a fickle marketplace? One wrapped up in latent geekery and superhero worship? I hated Madagascar 3 and deemed it unworthy of a review. I thought it was junk and I got bored with it, fast.
During Brave, I couldn't believe what I was seeing. The detail and the design choices are really impressive. And, we're not just talking about Merida's hair; we're talking forests and castles and chases and the sequence where she rides a horse through the forest and shoots her bow is something special.
I will not add any spoilers. I will tell you this--ignore the critics and go see Brave, no matter how old you are.
Labels:
Analysis,
Animation,
Arts,
Cinema,
Commentary,
Criticism,
Editorial,
Film,
Review
Links to this post
No comments:
Want More Time Off? Sorry, Can't Help You
I realize that this is about "elite" workers, but, really, the statistics cover ALL workers, and when we talk about the benefits enjoyed by workers, once it becomes fashionable to take them away from some, the employers will reduce them for all. Yes, even pesky lawyers.
Our Galtian overlords think we are lazy, indolent, overfed, and underworked. That's why they are destroying public sector unions--those people sometimes get as much as six weeks off per year. Since the late 1970s what has happened? Private section union membership has decreased while most of the union membership has stayed in public sector unions. So, the only thing standing in the way of reducing the amount of time off, on average, that the American worker enjoys is the size of the public sector unions. Once they are destroyed, it's over.
The elimination of benefits for workers begins with those who have no voice. Once they see their benefits reduced or eliminated, it becomes easier to chip away at the benefits enjoyed by others. If American workers at all levels remain in a "I've got mine, screw the other guy" tribal mentality, then there's very little left for anyone to wish for. This really is one of those situations where we're all in it together. The people at the very top are hoping on division and strife to destroy huge chunks of the American workforce, and public sector unions are under siege right now. After them, the fatter benefits enjoyed by workers depicted above are next.
If you want to argue that people should have more time off, fine. But don't pretend that employers are going to give that away. They might negotiate with employees for more time off, but unless you are organized, forget about it.
With over 8% unemployment, they're not going to give anyone anything unless it is pried from their greedy, chubby little fingers. And, of course, people hate unions, unions are corrupt, unions are full of mafia members, unions destroyed America five times before Ronald Reagan saved us all, blah, blah, blah...
If you want to argue that people should have more time off, fine. But don't pretend that employers are going to give that away. They might negotiate with employees for more time off, but unless you are organized, forget about it.
With over 8% unemployment, they're not going to give anyone anything unless it is pried from their greedy, chubby little fingers. And, of course, people hate unions, unions are corrupt, unions are full of mafia members, unions destroyed America five times before Ronald Reagan saved us all, blah, blah, blah...
The simple fact is, tribalism is bringing down America, and our elites couldn't be more pleased with that.
Labels:
Blog,
Blogging,
Commentary,
Economics,
Economy,
Editorial,
Elitism,
Employment,
History,
Information,
Jobs,
News,
Opinion,
Statistics,
Unemployment,
Wages,
Wealth,
Work
Links to this post
No comments:
Look at That Face
There are some who speculate that House Speaker John Boehner has a severe drinking problem, and emotional issues, but I will not countenance any of those possibilities here.
He looks like he's have quite a serious sad, though, does he not? When you are at an event, having people take your photo, there are bound to be unflattering shots. One would think that a man who has been in politics for as long as Boehner would remember that.
Labels:
Analysis,
Health,
Health Care,
News,
Photography,
Photos,
Politics
Links to this post
No comments:
Katie Holmes is 33
Given that the divorce was filed by Holmes and that she only lasted five years, this entire thing does seem like a contractual obligation that has ended abruptly. The fact that each of the ex-wives of Tom Cruise have been 33 years old when seeking to divorce him does lend itself to some interesting speculation.
It would be tempting to look past all of the celebrity glamour and nonsense and wonder if any of these people are real, but, honestly. The celebrity media does not care. This is just the story of a young woman who married a man who has a lot of money, power, and show business influence and then decided to look elsewhere for whatever it is she couldn't make up when he was not around.
Perfect looking people are usually anything but perfect. This has been true since forever.
Labels:
Business,
Celebrities,
Celebrity,
Commentary,
Entertainment,
Family,
Legal,
News,
Opinion,
Relationships,
Scandal,
Society,
Stars
Links to this post
No comments:
Which Way Do You Want It?
President Obama and his socialist minions finally find a way to stay out of the way of small government conservatives and libertarians alike and this is the thanks he gets?
So, the President is not supposed to be spending money that we don't have, but the President is supposed to be spending money on planes that might not even have helped contain this fire because certain wind-driven forest fires cannot be stopped, no matter what?
We don't have any money to spend on health care, a stimulus package, improving our nation's infrastructure (hello, what do you think a fire-fighting plane is part of but the infrastructure of the Federal firefighting effort?), taking care of Veterans, investing in new technologies, getting off foreign oil, or finding renewable energy sources, but we're supposed to buy the idea that there's plenty of money to fight forest fires from the air in Colorado Springs and Colorado Springs only but the Obama Administration has been too slow to spend that money we don't have?
Convoluted logic much? Either you believe in a functioning, active government that spends money and invests in things like planes and technology and preventative forest management or you believe in things like the Ryan budget plan which cuts money for those things and starves old people and gives tax breaks to the wealthy. If you're going to sit here and say you believe in both, get the hell out of town.
That reminds me of a saying. Everybody hates the government, but damned if they don't change their mind when a fire truck pulls up at two in the morning and saves their house from burning down. Damned if they certainly don't.
So, the President is not supposed to be spending money that we don't have, but the President is supposed to be spending money on planes that might not even have helped contain this fire because certain wind-driven forest fires cannot be stopped, no matter what?
We don't have any money to spend on health care, a stimulus package, improving our nation's infrastructure (hello, what do you think a fire-fighting plane is part of but the infrastructure of the Federal firefighting effort?), taking care of Veterans, investing in new technologies, getting off foreign oil, or finding renewable energy sources, but we're supposed to buy the idea that there's plenty of money to fight forest fires from the air in Colorado Springs and Colorado Springs only but the Obama Administration has been too slow to spend that money we don't have?
Convoluted logic much? Either you believe in a functioning, active government that spends money and invests in things like planes and technology and preventative forest management or you believe in things like the Ryan budget plan which cuts money for those things and starves old people and gives tax breaks to the wealthy. If you're going to sit here and say you believe in both, get the hell out of town.
That reminds me of a saying. Everybody hates the government, but damned if they don't change their mind when a fire truck pulls up at two in the morning and saves their house from burning down. Damned if they certainly don't.
Labels:
Commentary,
Earth,
Editorial,
Environment,
Government,
Information,
Money,
News,
Opinion,
Society,
Spending,
Taxes,
Transportation,
Work
Links to this post
No comments:
Another Wingnut Doubles Down on the Crazy
![]() |
| The whiny ass titty baby flag flies proudly... |
You lost.
Every time those of us who are progressives and liberals and whatever else that is reasonable loses, we accept the defeat and move on. We keep trying. We never give up.
Those of you who hate America, hate government, and hate it when other people get something that helps keep them alive, give up and cry when you lose, and you know it. You cry about it like someone just took your ice cream cone and smashed it into the tailpipe of an outbound truck.
Fly your flag upside down, and desecrate it with your nonsense opinions. You are certainly free to do so. But, welcome to being mocked and derided for your lameness and your immaturity. Welcome to being shown the door that helps you exit the arena of public discourse.
By the way, you lost yesterday. Stings like motherfucker, doesn't it?
Go out into whatever community you live in and make loud noises about how you hate this country. Give your last $37 to the Romney campaign and watch them blow through it in nanoseconds while Mitt shakes the Etch-a-Sketch and tries to ignore the fact that Obamacare is, essentially, Romneycare. Why'd you nominate him again? He's not going to beat Obama now, no matter how much money you pour into voter suppression.
Oh, that's right. No one else wanted to run against the fact that America is a country where we take care of the unlucky, the unfortunate, and where we don't, as the President says, let someone's fortune hang on chance.
Washington D.C. is the place of the status quo, up and until it is time to do something to ensure that the wellbeing of the people is improved, however nominally, by an idea put forward by liberals and opposed by conservatives that, ultimately, becomes the law of the land. Then, the status quo protects itself until the level of outrage in the country rises to another breaking point. On the health care issue, that breaking point passed years ago and now we have reform. We need more reform, and that ball is now rolling in the right direction, forward, and in a progressive manner.
Suck on that and think about what that means for your vaunted ideas.
Your pathetic screeching is unseemly, but it is not without precedent. They howled when Social Security was passed. They screamed when African-Americans gained Civil Rights. There was quite a bit of kvetching when Medicare passed. And, with good reason. Your tribal instincts always come down to a desire to deny everyone else anything decent so that you can keep that extra bit of cash in your pocket for whatever poison you prefer.
Welcome to what America is going to remain, bitches. When you lost yesterday, you lost the biggest game since 1964. And you lost because one of your very own conservative soul mates decided not to ruin American government and jump on the bandwagon to stupid town.
I love winning, and this is my victory lap. Lay down on the track so I can step over you and laugh.
Full Metal Wingnut
You read that correctly.
A man with training in the law of the land actually wrote that "we have to ask the question when do we turn that gun around and say no and resist."
Those are his own words, and his own thoughts, and, of course he cannot bring himself to actually get the words out there as he intended them. Matt Davis is no dummy. He knows he has to couch his violent, eliminationist rhetoric in such a way as to make his intention into a lame and cowardly rhetorical question that he can deny later on.
This is why I insist on pointing out that today's Supreme Court ruling means nothing to people who don't respect the rule of law unless a Republican is the beneficiary of the breaking of the law. When they think a Democrat is breaking the law, suddenly, they hew to the intent of the law as if it were something they, themselves created out of nothing.
For the rest of everyone's natural life, these people will fight to undo what was decided today because they refuse to live in a world where other people have a reasonable expectation to not be ruined and die needlessly if they happen to get sick.
Labels:
Commentary,
Conservative,
Editorial,
Guns,
Health Care,
Justice,
Law,
Medical,
News,
Opinion,
The Rule of Law,
Violence
Links to this post
No comments:
Russell Brand Doesn't Translate Well
A good tag usually employs fewer words, but this one is worthy of mentioning.
Russell Brand had a good thing going in Britain. He made the mistake of thinking that what he does will be accepted in the United States. Aside from a few good performances, what Brand does best is talk about himself. He is his own best character.
So, how does he translate to the American audience? Rather poorly, I'm afraid, and I do like what he does. I like his manic energy and I can get what he's shooting for. But manic doesn't play well in America. Weird has to be harmless and almost sexless, and Brand is neither easy on himself nor is he asexual in any way.
However, FX is probably the best place for him. His show could work if he is allowed to be himself, to be relentlessly British, and to be honest. Since FX has not screwed up Louie, I would imagine they are going to avoid screwing up Brand X.
Labels:
Advertising,
Business,
Celebrities,
Celebrity,
Comedy,
Cool Stuff,
Editorial,
Entertainment,
Humor,
Ideas,
News,
Opinion,
Society,
Stars
Links to this post
No comments:
The Bonny Project
I have a new short story up on Amazon, and it emerged from an idea that I had several years ago about the revisionist history that has long accompanied the idea that General Sherman's March to the Sea destroyed the South. The hagiography of the Civil War deserves a little tweaking now and then, and The Bonny Project is my silly attempt at doing just that.
This is a short story, and it clocks in at just under 5,000 words.
Once Amazon adds this to my author page, there will be a free promotional cycle, and I use Thursdays as my free promo day. New titles like this are available for free download to the Kindle on Thursdays, so take advantage of this if you can.
Try it free |
![]()
Read books on your computer or other mobile devices with ourFREE Kindle Reading Apps.
|
| ||
The Bonny Project [Kindle Edition]
Warren Jason Street (Author)| Digital List Price: | $2.99 What's this? |
| Kindle Purchase Price: | $2.99 |
| Prime Members: | $0.00 (borrow for free from your Kindle) Prime Eligible |
|
For Kindle Device Owners
Amazon Prime members with a Kindle device now enjoy free access to this book. Sign up for a one month free trial of Amazon Prime to borrow this book at no cost.
With Prime, Kindle owners can choose from over 145,000 titles to borrow for free – including all seven Harry Potter books and more than 100 current and former New York Times Bestsellers – as frequently as a book a month, with no due dates. Learn more about Kindle Owners' Lending Library.
|
Book Description
Publication Date: June 27, 2012
The Bonny Project was an effort undertaken by the Confederate States of America in 1863 to hide hundreds of men in Southern society by teaching them to disguise their appearance. The discovery of a secret archive of papers, letters, pictures, and official documents raises significant questions for a venerated Southern university.
Labels:
American History,
Commentary,
History,
Kindle,
LIbrary,
Life,
Personal,
Projects,
Reading,
Society,
Technology,
Weblog,
Writing
Links to this post
No comments:
The Health Care Ruling Reveals the Wingnut Revulsion Towards Taxes
Well, that was quite a ruling, wasn't it?
You can feel the sighs of relief out there (and the gnashing of teeth can be heard as well). American history is one straight line--from the old ways of doing things to a more progressive way of life. Each and every time conservatives try to stop progress, there has to be a ruling or a decision made to allow the American people to continue rolling forward. We ebb and flow, forward and back, but the momentum is usually forward and almost always in the direction of more freedom, not less.
If you think having freedom means not having to worry that getting sick will ruin you financially and destroy your family's way of life, then you ended up a little freer today.
Buried in the ruling is the word tax. The use of the word tax is extremely telling, for this is how the new line of attack will probably form. Conservatives will call this a tax, will rail against it as a huge tax, and will use the word tax so many times, it will take on an ethereal meaning.
The conservatives will never stop trying to kill this legislation. They will never give up. They will use the tax angle to try to chip away at the fact that the government is now in the business of helping people get health care and keep their freedom. This is appropriate and just, and this is what we need in order to transform America into a much better society. When people can live their lives, free of the fear of being ruined by a simple illness, we are already on a common sense path towards a better way of life for all.
Ronald Reagan raised taxes numerous times. Taxes aren't nearly as bad as lying about what is, and what is not a tax. So, when the Chief Justice calls it a tax, that's his opinion. It is not a fact. The Supreme Court hands out opinions, not the truth.
Here's some truth for you--it's Constitutional, and everyone who is mad about that right now needs a hug.
When you're done hugging them, remember. The relentless assault on universal health care coverage continues. The fight to make the law permanent and unassailable is something progressives are going to have to fight for every single day for the rest of our natural lives.
We have to make this legislation and this system better, and we have to keep working at it in the face of an enemy that will never stop trying to ruin government of, by, and for the people because they hate government, they hate you, and they want you to die, sick and alone, because their world doesn't make sense when things go right for others.
You can feel the sighs of relief out there (and the gnashing of teeth can be heard as well). American history is one straight line--from the old ways of doing things to a more progressive way of life. Each and every time conservatives try to stop progress, there has to be a ruling or a decision made to allow the American people to continue rolling forward. We ebb and flow, forward and back, but the momentum is usually forward and almost always in the direction of more freedom, not less.
If you think having freedom means not having to worry that getting sick will ruin you financially and destroy your family's way of life, then you ended up a little freer today.
Buried in the ruling is the word tax. The use of the word tax is extremely telling, for this is how the new line of attack will probably form. Conservatives will call this a tax, will rail against it as a huge tax, and will use the word tax so many times, it will take on an ethereal meaning.
The conservatives will never stop trying to kill this legislation. They will never give up. They will use the tax angle to try to chip away at the fact that the government is now in the business of helping people get health care and keep their freedom. This is appropriate and just, and this is what we need in order to transform America into a much better society. When people can live their lives, free of the fear of being ruined by a simple illness, we are already on a common sense path towards a better way of life for all.
Ronald Reagan raised taxes numerous times. Taxes aren't nearly as bad as lying about what is, and what is not a tax. So, when the Chief Justice calls it a tax, that's his opinion. It is not a fact. The Supreme Court hands out opinions, not the truth.
Here's some truth for you--it's Constitutional, and everyone who is mad about that right now needs a hug.
When you're done hugging them, remember. The relentless assault on universal health care coverage continues. The fight to make the law permanent and unassailable is something progressives are going to have to fight for every single day for the rest of our natural lives.
We have to make this legislation and this system better, and we have to keep working at it in the face of an enemy that will never stop trying to ruin government of, by, and for the people because they hate government, they hate you, and they want you to die, sick and alone, because their world doesn't make sense when things go right for others.
Labels:
Commentary,
Conservative,
Editorial,
Health,
Health Care,
Justice,
Medical,
News,
Opinion
Links to this post
No comments:
Brad DeLong Buries Austerity
The move to austerity crippled Europe; I don't think there is a sane person who would argue otherwise. But, austerity in America has been a huge bust, and you have to champion those who called it for what it was--stupid, irresponsible, and utterly, utterly ruinous.
One quibble--when DeLong celebrates Larry Summers, I know he's praising him in the big picture sense. In the small picture, however, it was Summers who argued against using TARP funds to aid small businesses.
I would argue that America's problem, economically, stems from the fact that not enough was done, or is being done, to stimulate small business activity.
This is the sort of madness that true economists face.
How much faith would you put in that nonsense? And yet, I can guarantee you that far too many decision-makers follow the line of thinking espoused by Pethokoukis rather than Krugman, et al.
Labels:
Blogging,
Business,
Commentary,
Economics,
Economy,
Editorial,
Finance,
Government,
History,
Media,
Money,
News,
Opinion,
Politics,
Spending,
Statistics,
Wealth
Links to this post
No comments:
The Twins Need Some Big Changes
I'll admit that I am a bit behind on following the Minnesota Twins, but, damn. Twenty-one hits given up in one game?
Isn't it about time to fire Ron Gardenhire? Isn't it about time for some new blood?
A Billionaire Has to Spend it on Something
This painting just sold for $36.7 million dollars. A host of other modern works has sold for record amounts.
The art world saw records shattered yesterday when Christie's Auction House held an auction for contemporary European-held art.
Also noteworthy, a collector unloaded Jean-Michel Basquiat's self-portrait after acquiring it in 2007. These things are done over the phone, of course, so who knows who won it? Why would you expect a billionaire to sit in a stuffy room and raise a paddle? That's how they do it on television, of course.
Labels:
Abstract art,
Analysis,
Art,
Arts,
Commentary,
Editorial,
Fine Art,
Humanities,
News,
Opinion,
Visual Arts
Links to this post
No comments:
Getting Away With It
It would appear that Mr. Dotcom is going to get away with whatever it is he was doing. A number of people might call it online storage, but the theft of intellectual property is fairly profitable. Somewhere, a Federal prosecutor is wondering what it's going to look like when this case falls apart.
I guess no one wants to harsh the buzz of being able to steal other people's ideas and work.
Labels:
Accountability,
Crime,
Editorial,
Internet,
Justice,
Law,
Legal,
News,
World
Links to this post
No comments:
Join the Army, Be a Roadie
These are Military Occupational Specialty modifiers or codes that are being floated under the new update and change to the job categories used in the United States Army. In the years ahead, these are the kinds of jobs that are going to be filled by skilled people, not just people who want a military career. As jobs dry up in America, these slots will become more and more competitive.
I especially like the one at the bottom, which, for all intents and purposes, should just be changed to "roadie."
Nine-Victor is very appropriate, though. Will the Army add vocalists? I believe that they will, eventually.
I especially like the one at the bottom, which, for all intents and purposes, should just be changed to "roadie."
Nine-Victor is very appropriate, though. Will the Army add vocalists? I believe that they will, eventually.
Labels:
Blog,
Blogging,
Commentary,
Editorial,
Entertainment,
Government,
News,
Opinion
Links to this post
No comments:
Science Always Wins in the End
There is a knee-slapper buried in this story. When they say that "Army Brass" interfered, what they mean to say is that "business as usual" took hold and science was given the old heave-ho. How many weapons systems and bases and active duty units are still around because of "business as usual" and not because of "common sense, needs of the Army, and basic facts?"
I am glad I never wore this particular uniform. This is what I wore, save for those two or three times they had us put on the desert camouflage variant.
While they are probably more comfortable than the summer-weight BDUs, being susceptible to enemy fire everywhere except in a gravel pit is not something you want to walk around in. I still think what you see above is perfectly fine for regular wear. No one knows where the next war is going to be fought; why not plan for a woodland battle somewhere on the Central European plain?
Labels:
Defense,
Fraud,
Government,
Incompetence,
Military,
Money,
Scam,
Scandal,
War
Links to this post
No comments:
CNN and Fox News Are Not in the Same Business
I really hate it when people think there is some comparison between CNN and Fox News.
This pet peeve of mine stems from the fact that I remember what CNN used to be because I watched it in the mid-1980s and enjoyed what they did. I became a news junkie primarily because CNN was in the news business and did a great job of making the news interesting and worthwhile. It was never something that you would use exclusively; CNN and the networks and the newspapers and the magazines added up to a much richer variety of sources for news.
But CNN never got into the news business to present "liberal" news. That's a fallacy. CNN got into the news business because there were no 24-hour news channels on cable television. Fox News was created so that this myth about a "liberal" bias in news could continue to be spread around like manure. But, really, it was the idea of Rupert Murdoch to bring to the United States what he had been doing in the Australian and British media, and his idea was to spread his ideology through his businesses and ram conservatism down the throats of people. Even with all of that laid bare in the British hearings on his dealings, Americans are still unaware of how insidious this really is.
CNN is about information; Fox News is about advocacy. They are not in the same business. Putting the numbers up and trying to say that Fox News has a better business model is misleading. How much accuracy is in the information transmitted to the public by each network? If you're trying to compare news and talk programs to ideologically slanted programs, you're not comparing anything that is equal in scope.
It is not CNN's fault that the American people refuse to be informed. It's merely the end of their business model. As CNN goes, so goes the decline of the three network news programs that, somehow, cling to life.
MSNBC is certainly trying to compete with Fox News in the same business, but NBC is responsible for the fact that MSNBC has to compete with one hand and two legs tied behind its collective back. At the corporate level, Fox News is encouraged to show bias and lie to viewers. NBC, on the other hand, frets over the liberal content of MSNBC and censors them, heavily. Don't believe me? Ask Phil Donahue, Ashleigh Banfield, and Keith Olbermann what they think.
And, really, it all comes down to Olbermann. If CNN gave Olbermann an hour in prime time, and let him do what he does, he'd clean up in the demographics (Fox News has great ratings, but lousy demographics because they attract older, less affluent viewers).
Olbermann will never get that chance. The only "opinion" we allow in America to be broadcast, uncensored and with the full approval of corporate management is a conservative one. Liberal opinion is not allowed to flourish.
So, what can fix CNN? Well, if the American people were to suddenly become interested in actual information, that might help. But Americans don't want information. They want advocacy, entertainment, and nothing else.
Labels:
American History,
Article,
Content,
Culture,
Journalism,
Media,
News,
Opinion,
Personal,
Society
Links to this post
No comments:
Now That's Crazy
I'm not going to argue that pets don't comfort people. They certainly do. But what is at work here goes beyond common sense.
It would appear that Aubrey O'Day simply doesn't want to have her dogs shipped in their crates with the other animals that are shipped on the plane. To go out and get a doctor to sign off on something like this makes a mockery of mental health issues in our society.
There's a fine line between being a lazy pain in the ass and being actually crazy. Leave it to a reality television star to straddle that line in public.
It would appear that Aubrey O'Day simply doesn't want to have her dogs shipped in their crates with the other animals that are shipped on the plane. To go out and get a doctor to sign off on something like this makes a mockery of mental health issues in our society.
There's a fine line between being a lazy pain in the ass and being actually crazy. Leave it to a reality television star to straddle that line in public.
Labels:
Animals,
Celebrities,
Celebrity,
Editorial,
Entertainment,
Health,
News,
Opinion,
Pictures,
Stars,
Television
Links to this post
No comments:
The End of Democracy in Europe
Now, let's talk about democracy.
Greece just had elections.
Greece is trying to find a way to meet its obligations.
Several members of that new Greek government are incapacitated, thus forcing those within Greece to find new leaders and follow whatever procedures are in place to move forward. Greece cannot meet its obligations unless it follows the rule of law and finds a way to put the right people in places where decisions are going to be made. Greece is trying to apply a democratic solution here. That is not possible given that the position taken by those who control the fate of Greece will not allow any deviation from a path that is already laid out.
The way for Greece to meet those obligations is to negotiate within its borders and with the European governing bodies that are helping it.
If there is a political settlement here, it has to come from negotiation. With these new elections and with these new figures, there has to be some flexibility or else the voice of the Greek voter becomes drowned out by a process that is certainly not democratic. The process hasn't been voted on by anyone, but those making the decisions have just faced the voters.
However, the German position is, no more negotiations, and no more politics. No more democracy, in other words, no matter what the circumstances.
Democracy, then, does not exist in Europe. Certainly not if one country is dictating to another how to proceed.
Labels:
Business,
Commentary,
Editorial,
Ethics,
Finance,
Government,
Legal,
Money,
News,
Opinion,
Politics,
Society
Links to this post
No comments:
Wimbledon
I had completely forgotten about Wimbledon, what with the Queen's Jubilee and the Olympics this summer.
How daunting must it be to have to hold this tournament in the middle between these two events, and how difficult it must be to live in London and environs right now. Is it possible that this will make this year's tournament better, or worse? I have no idea.
Labels:
Blog,
Blogging,
Commentary,
Editorial,
Media,
News,
Opinion,
Tennis
Links to this post
No comments:
Mitt Romney is Not One of Us
I shouldn't use DISQUS as my personal trolling site, but I just can't stop laughing at this idea that Mitt Romney is going to govern as a "republican" if he wins in November. He's proven, time and again, that no issue is worth defending. No position is worth holding if it means a political disadvantage, no matter how small.
He'll betray the conservative cause if it means a second term, or a favorable advantage, or a slight win, or a better view from his lofty perch. He is not a man of principle. He is a man of expediency and pragmatism.
Why can't anyone see that?
Labels:
Commentary,
Conservative,
Editorial,
Elections,
Ethics,
News,
Republican,
Values
Links to this post
No comments:
Tubingen Through the Leaves
The shadows are leaves, and I can't figure out how they showed up like this.
I think I was standing in a dark place up near Schloss Hohentubingen and that's how they appeared in the photo. The older house in the center really stands out, as compared to the modern homes and buildings around it. I liked how it turned out, otherwise I would have probably discarded this shot.
Labels:
Architecture,
Art,
Blog,
Commentary,
Germany,
Images,
Landscape,
Nature,
Photo,
Photography,
Photos,
Pictures,
Travel
Links to this post
No comments:
Rainbow
Labels:
Art,
Blog,
Commentary,
Images,
Landscape,
Nature,
Photo,
Photography,
Photos,
Pictures
Links to this post
No comments:
Trier Hauptmarkt
Labels:
Architecture,
Art,
Blog,
Commentary,
Germany,
Images,
Photo,
Photography,
Photos,
Pictures,
Travel
Links to this post
No comments:
The Hate is Spread Far and Wide
I'm still not aware of any actual "gun control" that has been put into effect since whenever, but, damned if there aren't people who are terrified of something that isn't happening and are hell-bent on making money from something that no one is proposing to do.
Religious nuttery and far-right politics go hand in hand. And these people are going to vote for a moderate Mormon flip-flopper? I still cannot understand why anyone thinks Mitt Romney is going to automatically bring these people out to vote--unless, of course, he can run a campaign that whips up enough irrational hatred of the President.
Religious nuttery and far-right politics go hand in hand. And these people are going to vote for a moderate Mormon flip-flopper? I still cannot understand why anyone thinks Mitt Romney is going to automatically bring these people out to vote--unless, of course, he can run a campaign that whips up enough irrational hatred of the President.
Are They Howling in Beantown?
This may look like a good trade on paper, but does it damage the team chemistry in Boston?
I'm not going to get into whether this makes sense from a baseball perspective as far as bringing in players that can help Boston win; I think it opens up the question of whether or not you trade a popular player who has contributed and what you can expect from fans when you do exactly that.
In baseball, nostalgia and sentimentality end when a player stops being productive. No matter who you are, you're gone if you can't produce. I'm not aware of the inability of Kevin Youkilis to produce for Boston. Are they happy to see him go? Or are they howling for blood?
This is Not a Win For Steve Carell
If you were looking for Steve Carell to have a hit film, you're in for a long wait. You might have to wait until they finally put together an Anchorman 2.
It must have been very appealing for him to leave The Office and start a movie career. When you can't even beat an Adam Sandler film that everyone pretty much hates, your movie career is really not getting under way in a meaningful fashion. Crazy, Stupid Love made money, but it had Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone in it.
This is going to be a tough summer for films, especially films that aren't superhero-related.
UPDATE:
Someone at CNN is a little harsher than myself on poor Steve Carell. Why not be the same way towards Keira Knightley? I'm not aware of her being anything more than a potential movie star. She has done far too many things that are middling or nearly good for my tastes.
Her pairing here with Carell is not a believable mix of anything. This is the standard Hollywood formula of mixing a middle-aged man with a much younger woman who is there because she is beautiful. See Richard Gere in everything he's done, save Hachi.
Labels:
Arts,
Business,
Celebrities,
Celebrity,
Cinema,
Editorial,
Entertainment,
Film,
Ideas,
Marketing,
Movies,
News,
Pictures,
Releases
Links to this post
No comments:
Why Getting a Star is Meaningless
I know that the whole idea of getting a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame is somewhat akin to being a rock and roll band in the 1960s and the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame--eventually, you'll get yours (unless you're the Moody Blues, of course).
Helen Mirren doesn't already have a star? That's impossible to believe. And she's getting her star on the day when the Backstreet Boys are getting their star? For what, exactly?
Something in this entire process is broken, but who cares?
Helen Mirren doesn't already have a star? That's impossible to believe. And she's getting her star on the day when the Backstreet Boys are getting their star? For what, exactly?
Something in this entire process is broken, but who cares?
Labels:
Acting,
Arts,
Celebrities,
Celebrity,
Cinema,
Commentary,
Entertainment,
News,
Opinion,
Stars
Links to this post
No comments:
I Love Getting Trolled by Donald Crispis
The pride of Perth, Australia. Apparently, some fellow names Donald Crispis likes to make all kinds of comments, often one after the other, unaware of this thing called comment moderation.
Note the url which brought him here, and then note the high level of discourse this individual is capable of. I have a feeling I am not the only person he has trolled today.
Donald Crispis, come on back and let's talk this through. I'm sure that you're a reasonable fellow in front of your boss at the place where you don't work very hard being mediocre.
Killesberg Tower, Stuttgart
A fairly decent shot of the Killesberg Tower.
Going up and down it, no problem. Being on the top, no problem. But, when you sit and ponder what holds it up, well. I had no trouble getting down.
Labels:
Architecture,
Art,
Blog,
Commentary,
Design,
Germany,
Images,
Landscape,
Photo,
Photography,
Photos,
Pictures,
Travel
Links to this post
No comments:
Endless Speculation About Stonehenge Continues Unabated
There are so many theories about Stonehenge, it's a wonder it doesn't explain the theory of why one of your socks is always missing after you put your clothes in the dryer. Here is yet another attempt to achieve the impossible.
Does it matter to keep making these theories? I suppose that scientists will always look for new and exciting ways to restate the obvious. Stonehenge is a Neolithic monument that is actually part of a massive site called England. It is not one place; it is actually a part of a much larger series of circles and other monuments, many of which people ignore or do not understand.
The story of Stonehenge is lost. The Neolithics are gone. The stones remain. We will never discover anything approaching a "real" purpose. We can, however, embrace what is left and avoid having to control the story. Can't it be a fantastic place? Can't it just be a Neolithic space observatory? Why does it have to be about pottery and modern politics? Next you'll tell me that Stonehenge is where the celebrities went to mix it up with the commoners. Who were the paparazzi of 2675 B.C.?
The Neolithics had their own way of doing things. Unless someone figures out how to dig one of them up and conduct an interview in the lost language of their people, you can forget about "unlocking" the mystery of Stonehenge. We are never going to figure them out. They were as human as your or I, and they had a complexity that is universal to the human experience.
Why did they build it? Why not? And, oh by the way, why do you need that answer? Is that because you want to know, or does it serve the needs of people who want to put the ancients in their place?
If they can be made to appear as ignorant savages, then not knowing why they did what they did makes perfect sense.
What shocks me is that people do not know how "common" henges and things of that nature really are. Check out The Modern Antiquarian. Educate yourself. There is no better resource out there for coming to the conclusion that, hey, we're never going to figure it out so we might as well just enjoy what was left behind.
They worshipped the way the stars and the sun and the moon worked. They didn't hide behind a church hierarchy to keep people ignorant and in the dark. Their church was the world, and they aligned the stones and the mounds to calculate when the sun and the moon were going to be every day of the year. They understood the movement of the heavens and what it meant to them is never going to be understood by us.
Don't give money to people who cannot prove what Stonehenge really was. Rejoice in the complexity that is the human experience. Build your own version somewhere. Dedicate your life to the movement of the sun through the sky and change the landscape with piles of stones to help you track what's happening. Chant, dance, and sing when you think you have something that approximates an answer. Then, get back to me and tell me what you think. I can guarantee you--you'll know more than any "scientist" ever will.
Labels:
Commentary,
Content,
Editorial,
Elitism,
Essay,
History,
Life,
Opinion,
Science,
World
Links to this post
No comments:
Bruce Springsteen Doesn't Care About Chris Christie
There are about fifty or sixty things wrong here--wrong with this post, wrong with the idea that Bruce Springsteen, who is an artist, is supposed to kiss the ass of Chris Christie, who is a politician, but still.
I think what Jeffrey Goldberg does here is our modern day version of navel gazing. He is so wrapped up in the idea that a serious artist is supposed to care about a politician that he fails to understand that if that politician stands for, and runs against, and speaks against, virtually everything that the artist has spoken out about that it stands to reason that the artist is not going to want to socialize with the politician. Goldberg thinks that, at this elite level, that integrity doesn't count for anything. Well, if Christ Christie is trying to find a way to destroy the unions that represent teachers, then Bruce Springsteen might have a problem being associated with that sort of thing, especially since those are the "heroes" that Springsteen probably wants everyone to respect and emulate, rather than himself. I am not aware of any songs about teachers, politicians, or navel-gazing journalists that Springsteen has done, but there it is.
Goldberg begins and ends his fawning piece without realizing is that Springsteen creates music that comforts the afflicted, and afflicts the comfortable--something that we used to have when there was a working press in this country. Goldberg might explode if he discovered his own lack of self-awareness on that front.
Case in point--why is there no incredulity when Christie derides Springsteen as a "limousine liberal?"
He told me once that he accepts Springsteen’s “limousine liberal” politics the way a spouse accepts an annoying tic in her partner. “There is some of his work that is dour and down,” he says, “but the thing that attracted me to his music is how aspirational it is—aspirational to success, to fun, to being a better person, to figuring out how to make your life better—and you can’t say that about most people’s music. They become successful and then they become self-consumed and then boring and narcissistic.”
He turns to Velez, who runs New Jersey’s hard-pressed social-services agencies. “Hey, you, you’re the commissioner of human services, this is for you, pay attention.” Velez, who grew up in a trailer park in the Meadowlands (and who is a holdover from the Corzine administration), says of Springsteen’s preoccupation with the poor: “I always find this part very inauthentic.”
From the indifferent reaction of the crowd, not too many people understand, or care, what Springsteen is saying. Christie takes solace in this.And Goldberg can't figure out why Springsteen doesn't want anything to do with Christie? Wow.
Labels:
Activism,
Blog,
Blogging,
Commentary,
Culture,
Editorial,
Elitism,
Government,
Media,
News,
Opinion,
Society
Links to this post
No comments:
No Clemency For Jonathan Pollard
How does CNN allow this nonsense to appear? What a pack of lies.
Jonathan Pollard did irreparable harm to the interests and intelligence capabilities of the United States of America by passing classified material to Israel. He should never be granted clemency.
There is a cottage industry out there, trying to generate enough smoke to hide the facts--and the fact remains, Pollard burned a massive hole in the intelligence gathering capability of the United States. He deserves to spend the rest of his life right where he is today.
Labels:
Commentary,
Crime,
Defense,
Editorial,
Intelligence,
Justice,
Law,
Military,
World
Links to this post
No comments:
Porta Nigra Arches
Textures at Porta Nigra, showing the contrast of the blackened stones with the wear and tear of centuries.
Labels:
Architecture,
Art,
Blog,
Commentary,
Germany,
Images,
Landscape,
Photo,
Photography,
Photos,
Pictures
Links to this post
No comments:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






































